In May, we presented the updated Records Management for Legal Consul briefing. Video from the two parts of this briefing have now been uploaded on NARA’s You Tube Channel. A copy of the briefing slides is available as a .pdf.
This program utilizes CART services in place of sign language interpreters. To see the captions, click on the CC logo at the lower right part of the frame.
Below are the videos and the major points in each session.
Records Management for Legal Counsel Part I – Time: 1:25:00
Key points in Federal statutory and regulatory requirements that relate to agency records
Best practices in building a defensible records management program
Counsel’s role in an agency records management program
Challenges and legal issues associated with electronic records
Records Management for Legal Counsel Part II – Time: 1:13:00
Statutory updates from 2014
The role of legal counsel in an agency’s record keeping program
E-Record keeping and E-Discovery
Legal holds on records and the duty of agency counsel
Posted in General
Tagged training, video
NARA is pleased to announce that we have issued NARA Bulletin 2015-01, Determining the Appropriate Age for Scheduling the Legal Transfer of Permanent Records to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
This Bulletin clarifies the appropriate age at which permanent records, regardless of their media or format, should be transferred into NARA’s legal custody. Generally, records should not be scheduled for the legal transfer to NARA before 15 years for unclassified records and 25 years for classified records. This bulletin is associated with a new scheduling aid, Checklist for Proposing the Early Legal Transfer of Permanent Records. The checklist is a tool to help agencies and NARA staff determine if the records are appropriate for legal transfer before 15 years.
NARA Bulletins provide fundamental guidance to Federal agencies who must then determine the most appropriate ways to incorporate the guidance into their work.
A briefing on this Bulletin will be delivered at the August BRIDG meeting. Please leave any questions and comments you may have. Thank you.
Later this year, the U.S. Government will publish the third National Open Government Action Plan (NAP). This will build on the prior action plans published in 2011 and 2013. Our efforts to improve the management of government records, through things like the Managing Government Records Directive, have been included in these previous plans.
Now, we are soliciting input on this effort from our stakeholders. Please read this post from the Open Government Initiative to see how you can get involved. We look forward to your suggestions and getting them in the next version of the National Open Government Action Plan.
Here is the next tip from our GRS Team.
Flexible retentions in the GRS: Your new best friend
Many new GRS disposition instructions look like this: “Destroy when 3 years old, but longer retention is authorized if required for business use.” Some reviewers have criticized us for this latitude, and recommended that we state a specific retention period (in the above case, 3 years), then stop. They object to the elastic clause. Here’s what we bet is at the bottom of these objections, and why we believe flexibility is really in agencies’ best interests.
We suspect the main objection to retention flexibility is a fear that offices outside the direct sight lines of an agency’s records management function will abuse “longer retention is authorized” as license to never discard anything ever again. If our guess just tapped into the primal root of your own objection to flexible retention, we have good news. Flexible retention really is the agency records officer’s new best friend. If a GRS item has an elastic disposition, as long as you retain records for the minimum time required, you can do one of three things:
- You can determine how long your agency has business use for the records. Answering the question “how long is enough?” is more work than pulling a number out of a hat, and less entertaining than throwing darts at a dartboard, but conversation with subject area experts should get you to a good, defensible answer. Once you’ve determined the right time period for your agency in excess of the minimum in the GRS, you can publish it without the flexible elastic clause in your records manual and cite the GRS item as your authority.
- You can determine that your agency will do just fine with the minimum retention period in the GRS, and not a day longer. Use the GRS item in your agency manual without the flexible elastic clause and cite the GRS item as your authority.
- You can do nothing. Let individual offices in your agency determine their own business needs. We can’t recommend this as a best practice, but we acknowledge it as an option.
And the good news mentioned above? Did you notice that in all three of these options you do not have to process a records schedule through NARA or ask for a GRS exception? You have the authority to make choices to best suit your agency. We think that’s very good news indeed.
Posted in GRS
Tagged GRS, retention
We are requesting comments on a draft NARA Bulletin entitled “Guidance on Managing Digital Identity Authentication Records.” The draft is available here (.pdf).
This draft Bulletin will provide guidance on the records management requirements related to digital identification records. Specifically, this guidance will provide guidance on managing digital identity authentication-related transactional records, such as digital certificates and Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) files created or used in the course of agency business. This Bulletin will also supersede several of NARA’s records management guidance for PKI digital signature authenticated and secured transaction records.
Agencies use digital identity authentication to protect sensitive records, authenticate employee sign-ins, identify ownership of websites, and many other purposes. They use a wide variety of software. Because of the wide variety of uses and software, the Bulletin provides agencies flexibility in using digital identity authentication technology to manage temporary records. However, when agencies transfer permanent electronic records to NARA, the records must be free of encryption or other forms of security (unless permanent records must be encrypted during transfer to NARA).
Please make your comments about the draft Bulletin by June 12, 2015. Please comment below or email comments to Lisa Haralampus at Lisa.Haralampus@nara.gov. We will review all the comments we receive. Thank you.
This is a reminder that NARA is holding an open public meeting on Thursday, May 21, 2015, from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. in the McGowan Theater (basement level), National Archives and Records Administration downtown building, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW to solicit comments on General Records Schedule 6.1: Email Managed under a Capstone Approach. This is in conjunction with its publication in the Federal Register.
NARA will now also be live-streaming this event for convenience of interested participants and those who may not be in the DC area. Participants can access the event at the below link. Questions and comments during the event are encouraged on the live stream page. Participants can also send questions or comments in advance by 9:00am on the day of the event to email@example.com.
If attending in person, please enter on the Constitution Avenue side of the building, the “Special Events” entrance (which is actually the exit for the general public). Registration information and other additional information on this meeting is published in a separate Federal Register Public meeting Notice.
A copy of the review package comprised of the proposed records disposition schedule, accompanying FAQ, and appraisal memoranda, can be downloaded (.pdf). To aid in public understanding of this GRS, we also created a White Paper (.pdf) that provides additional background information on the Capstone approach, appraisal of records at NARA, and the development of this general records schedule. So that we can insure all comments are received and considered for the Federal Register comment period, comments must be sent to firstname.lastname@example.org no later than June 1, 2015.
Posted in GRS
Tagged capstone, GRS
Our GRS Team continues to work on updating the General Records Schedules. However, they also will be providing updates on particular questions that they receive. Consider this your GRS Tip of the Month!
Whatever happened to GRS items for electronic mail and word processing files?
NARA enacted a new policy in 1998: all new records schedules must include two items covering “electronic mail and word processing system copies…used solely to generate a recordkeeping copy” of agency records. These items—one for “copies that have no further administrative value after the recordkeeping copy is made,” the other for “copies used for dissemination, revision, or updating” the record copy—enabled disposal of multiple iterations of the same document littering agency electronic servers. NARA applied this new policy to itself, too, and appended these items to most (but not all) GRS schedules when it published GRS Transmittal 8 later that same year.
This requirement was never very popular with either agency records schedulers or NARA appraisers. The items’ sheer repetitiveness made it obvious early on that they were ideal candidates for GRS items. NARA Bulletin 2006-04 rescinded the 1998 policy. These items were removed and replaced by GRS 20, items 13 and 14, in GRS Transmittal 22 in 2010. The GRS 20 items were in turn superseded by GRS 4.3, item 040, in GRS Transmittal 23. The GRS now covers any non-recordkeeping copy in an electronic format.
Another item in the OMB/NARA Managing Government Records Directive that we have been working on is item B4. This item called on us to identify a government-wide analytical to help agencies evaluate the effectiveness of their records programs.
We have been working with the Federal Records Council on this project and are now pleased to announce that the Records Management Maturity Model (.xls spreadsheet) and separate user guide (.pdf) are now available on the directive website.
Using an analytical tool such as a maturity model can be a good way to assess your records and information management programs to determine where improvements are needed most. Maturity models provide a framework based on a set of core principles and standards to measure strengths and weaknesses and identify challenges that may undermine effectiveness. It provides a data supported method for planning and assigning resources. There are many good records and information management based models available (both public and private) to choose from. We encourage you to consider these types of tools when assessing your records management program. Feel free to adjust our maturity model to best fit the needs of your program.
Special thanks to the Department of Homeland Security (whose existing RM3i model was used as the starting point for this tool) for their support on this project. Additionally, many thanks to the records officers at the Departments of Justice, Transportation, Interior, and the Securities and Exchange Commission for their contributions to this project. We have also made the maturity model available on the Federal Records Officer Network (FRON).
We are always interested in hearing about new tools and best practices to help agencies. Also, if you have any questions please leave a comment below or send them to email@example.com.